메뉴 건너뛰기

정보나눔

장애인권

?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄 첨부
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄 첨부

1593603373_31878.jpg

Rally for "Real Abolition of DRS" ⓒbeminor.com

 

Korean disability organisations had long been fought against an eligibility criteria called “Disability Rating System”. The system introduced in 1985, with the Disability Welfare Law.The system divides persons with disabilities into 6 grades by medical standard. It long had been criticised for its inability- and impairment-focused design and also for the way of adaptation in service provide process. Disability organisations insisted that the system does not allow PWD to receive services on the basis of individual needs, but only fits people to the system, and let them live with limited disability service-including personal assistance.

 

It resulted in lower level of life, ignorance, segregation, even to death. The Solidarity Against Disability Discrimination(SADD), one of the disability organisations in South Korea, held a sit-in at Gwanghwamun subway station for 5 years(2014~2019) to abolish the DRS, the Family Duty of Support, and institutionalisation.

 

Last year of 2019, on 1st July, Korean government finally abolished the DRS. It announced that the eligibility for disability services will be assessed with “Disability Service Comprehensive Assessment Sheet”, which allegedly will assess needs of each disable people and provide tailored support. However, disability organisations including SADD assert that the government’s new model is not a ‘Real’ abolition of DRS. 
 

등급제-메인-1-1024x635.jpg

Rally for "Real Abolition of DRS" ⓒtheindigo.co.kr

 

What fears the PWD the most is uncertain future. According to the Ministry of Health and Welfare, 19.52% of newly assessed disabled people became to receive lower amount of personal assistance. Among them, 6.6% were assessed to receive PA service 30~150 hours lesser per month. So far, the only solution for declined service receives is ‘Assessment Exception’, which preserve current amount of PA service for three years. However, the ministry still does not come up with further plan after three years. 

 

Furthermore, persons who wants to receive disability service cannot reflect their voice in the assessment. It totally depends on the assessment practitioner, and the disabled person cannot know how they were assessed until the result comes out. 

 

Korean disability organisations criticise the government that the abolition of DRS should be accompanied with disability service budget, but currently, the rate of the disability service budget to the GDP is mere 0.4%, which is one fourth of the OECD average rate, 1.7%. 

 

On the first anniversary of DRS abolition, 1st July 2020, over 1,000 people participated to a rally, which organised by SADD to reveal the bare face of the government’s new model, which did not really move the power to decide who can receive how much. (press report: http://theindigo.co.kr/archives/6114)

 

*2020 July 1, Rally for Real Abolition of DRS. ⓒSADD

 

“The new model is just well-wrapped DRS, so the disabled people cannot actually feel the changes in their life” Seo Mihwa, the head person of Jeonnam province SADD, siad at the rally. “The government still does not provide 24 hours of personal assistance service for the persons with most severe disabilities” she continued, “Seeing the result of the assessments with the new assess system, there was no one was eligible for the full service currently provided from the government.”

 

Ahn Jaesung, a participant to the rally, received needs assessment last November and it resulted to less personal assistance service. Originally, he received 391 hours per month, but after the new assessment, he will only receive 350 hours. He filed a complaint, and become the object of “Assessment Exception”. However, after 3 years of the exception, he doesn't know what will happen. “Doesn't the Assessment Exception itself shows the flaw of new model? I heard that there is no measure to compensate the result. They only talk about stronger complaint system, but I feel anger for keep this flawed system as it is.”

 

Disability organisations expressed their will to fight until achieve the “real” abolition of DRS, which means the welfare paradigm shift from Provider-centred to Demand-centred. 

 

 

 


  1. No Image

    [COVID-19 and Disability] Statement-Disability-inclusive response to COVID-19 – Towards a better future for all

    Disability-inclusive response to COVID-19 – Towards a better future for all -A Statement by 138 Member States and Observers, response to the Secretary-General’s Policy Brief    
    Date2020.07.29 ByKDF Views1
    Read More
  2. No Image

    [COVID-19 and Disability] 유엔 회원국 공동성명-장애포괄적 코로나19 대응, 모두를 위한 더 나은 미래(국문 비공식 번역본)

        138개 유엔회원국 및 옵저버 국가들이 장애포괄적 코로나19 대응 마련의 필요성과 방안을 담은 공동성명을 냈네요. 한국 정부도 연명하였습니다. 앞으로 장애포괄적 대응 방안을 적극적이고 꼼꼼하게 만들어내겠다는 정부의 의지로 보고 기대를 해봅니다. ...
    Date2020.07.29 ByKDF Views23
    Read More
  3. [News Report] One Year after Disability Rating System Abolition: What Really Happened to the Disabled People

    Rally for "Real Abolition of DRS" ⓒbeminor.com   Korean disability organisations had long been fought against an eligibility criteria called “Disability Rating System”. The system introduced in 1985, with the Disability Welfare Law.The syst...
    Date2020.07.28 ByKDF Views11
    Read More
  4. [News Report] A Tragic Death of a Labourer with Intellectual Disability

    A Tragic Death of a Labourer with Intellectual Disability -Korean DCSOs, “This is a Social Murder”   Father of Kim Jae-soon is making memorial altar for his son. Photo by Lee Gayeon.   On May 22, Kim Jae-soon, a 26-year-old labourer with int...
    Date2020.06.11 ByKDF Views47
    Read More
  5. No Image

    [COVID-19 and Disability] 코로나19와 심리사회적 장애인에 관한 공동성명/Joint Statement on the rights of persons with psychosocial disabilities in COVID19 Pandemic

    심리사회적장애인 범아프리카 네트워크, 라틴아메리카 심리다양성 기금, TCI 아시아태평양, 정신의학이용자-경험자 및 생존자 유럽 네트워크(ENUSP), 정신의학 이용자-생존자 인권센터(CHRUSP), 세계 정신의학 이용자-생존자 네트워크(WNUSP)는 2020년 3월 26...
    Date2020.04.16 ByKDF Views43
    Read More
  6. No Image

    [COVID-19 and Disability] 국제장애연맹(IDA)의 장애포괄적 코로나19 대응 10개 권고

    국제장애연맹(IDA)가 작성한 '장애포괄적 코로나19 대응 10개 권고(Disability-Inclusive COVID19 Response: 10 recommendations)' 한국어본입니다.    해당 번역본은 국제장애연맹홈페이지(http://www.internationaldisabilityalliance.org/content/covid-19-...
    Date2020.04.09 ByKDF Views46
    Read More
  7. No Image

    [COVID-19 and Disability] Manual on Prevention and Response to Infectious Diseases

    Manual on Prevention and Response to Infectious Diseases of Korean Parents' Network for the People with Disabilities Gyeongnam branch   Eng. version translated by KDF    
    Date2020.04.03 ByKDF Views237
    Read More
  8. No Image

    [COVID-19 and Disability] Guideline on hospitalization of a person with disability confirmed with COVID-19

    Though Korean government is recognised of its fast-and-aggressive response to the virus, we're still struggling to achieve disability inclusive response to COVID-19. We'd like to share our experiences with our colleagues; what we hav...
    Date2020.03.31 ByKDF Views60
    Read More
  9. 홍콩 '장애인 거주시설 전염병 예방 수칙(guideline prevention of communicable diseases in rchd)' 일부 번역본

    홍콩 보건부(Department of Health)에서 2011년 배포한 '장애인거주시설 내 전염병 예방 수칙' 원본 및 일부 발췌 번역을 공유합니다.  번역본 링크:  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Uzbu68Fqsr3fhs5a4BeAddV4DNsp7NsLs185YN3fGeI/edit?usp=sharing (추...
    Date2020.03.03 ByKDF Views47
    Read More
목록
Board Pagination Prev 1 Next
/ 1
©2013 KSODESIGN.All Rights Reserved